ChatGPT Makes CSS Aspirants Less Creative | Daily Writeup | Opinions
The following article, “How Has ChatGPT Or Artificial Intelligence (AI) Made Central Superior Service (CSS) Aspirants Less Creative?”, is written by Bilal Ahmad, a student of Sir Syed Kazim Ali. Moreover, the article is written on the same pattern, taught by Sir to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. Sir Kazim has uploaded his students’ solved past paper questions so other thousands of aspirants can understand how to crack a topic or question, how to write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.
2-Understanding the term “ChatGPT” or “Artificial Intelligence”
3-How has ChatGPT or AI made CSS aspirants less creative?
- ✓ Reduction in critical thinking
- Evidence: According to a report by the National Centre for Education Statistics 2021, students who excessively depended on AI-generated content tended to score lower on tasks that required critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
- ✓ Erosion of creativity and imagination
- Evidence: According to a report by the National Academy of Sciences in 2020, students who heavily relied on AI-powered tools for academic tasks tended to show reduced creativity scores compared to their peers who engaged more in traditional learning approaches.
- ✓ limited understanding and depth of knowledge
- Evidence: According to a report by the Journal of Educational Technology & Society, students using AI-based platforms tend to rely on surface-level learning strategies, seeking quick answers rather than engaging in deep, critical thinking.
- ✓ Dependency and overreliance
- Evidence: According to a report by the National Centre for Education Statistics, an alarming number of students displayed a heavy dependency on AI for information retrieval and exam preparation.
- ✓ Limited retention of knowledge due to passive learning
- Evidence: According to a report by the Educational Testing Service (ETS), the use of ChatGPT and AI has been associated with reduced knowledge retention among students.
- ✓ Reduced exploration of unconventional topics and perspective
- Evidence: According to the Centre for Educational Research and Development (CERD) report, the AI-generated response primarily covered mainstream and widely accepted ideas, overlooking unconventional or niche perspectives
- ✓ To promote creativity-friendly environment
- ✓ To leverage AI as a tool for creativity rather than a substitute for it
Answer to the Question
The emergence of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has undoubtedly transformed the landscape of Central Superior Services (CSS) exam preparation, offering aspirants access to vast amounts of information, study materials, and practice resources. While these advancements have undeniably enhanced the efficiency of exam preparation and facilitated the acquisition of knowledge, there are concerns about their potential impact on the creativity of CSS aspirants. With AI’s ability to provide instant answers, suggest study patterns, and predict exam patterns, there is a risk that aspirants may become overly dependent on these tools, leading to a decline in their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Moreover, easy access to AI-generated content might inadvertently discourage some aspirants from deep contemplation and independent analysis. Instead of fostering creativity, the allure of quick solutions may lead aspirants to memorize pre-existing answers, limiting their ability to think critically and innovatively during the actual examination. However, aspirants should adopt a balanced approach to counter this negative impact. While leveraging AI tools to enhance their knowledge base and optimize study routines, they should also actively engage in self-reflection, brainstorming, and discussions to nurture their creative and analytical capabilities. By approaching AI as a supplementary resource rather than a replacement for human ingenuity, CSS aspirants can better navigate the changing landscape of exam preparation and cultivate the creativity necessary for effective and innovative public administration.
To begin with, it is pertinent to understand the term ChatGPT. ChatGPT is an AI (Artificial Intelligence) language model. It is designed to understand and generate human-like text responses. Trained on vast data, it can understand and produce coherent and contextually relevant text in various languages. Moreover, it can assist users in various tasks, including answering questions, providing recommendations, generating content, and engaging in natural language conversations. Analyzing input and generating relevant output is a powerful tool for communication and problem-solving, making it valuable for a wide range of applications in research, customer support, and creative content creation.
While ChatGPT and AI have undoubtedly brought numerous benefits to education and learning, they have also raised concerns about their potential impact on critical thinking among CSS aspirants. With easy access to information and quick answers, individuals may rely heavily on AI without engaging in the cognitive processes required for deep analytical thinking. According to a report by the National Centre for Education Statistics 2021, students who excessively depended on AI-generated content tended to score lower on tasks that required critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. This dependency can hinder their ability to critically evaluate information, develop independent thought, and solve complex problems, reducing their overall necessary thinking skills.
Moreover, the extensive use of ChatGPT and AI in assisting CSS aspirants may unintentionally lead to the erosion of creativity and imagination. CSS aspirants often face complex, challenging problems that require innovative solutions. While AI provides valuable insight and data, it may limit the student’s exploration and experimentation. On the other hand, creativity thrives in an environment of uncertainty, where students can explore multiple possibilities and arrive at unique solutions. Relying heavily on ChatGPT might confine aspirants to a rigid approach, preventing them from exploring diverse avenues and discovering novel perspectives. According to a report by the National Academy of Sciences in 2020, students who heavily relied on AI-powered tools for academic tasks tended to show reduced creativity scores compared to their peers who engaged more in traditional learning approaches.
In addition, the convenience of using ChatGPT and other AI tools might inadvertently discourage CSS aspirants from conducting in-depth research or consulting authoritative sources. Instead of delving into textbooks, academic papers, and expert opinions, students might opt for the easiest and fastest route by relying solely on AI-generated content. According to a Journal of Educational Technology & Society report, students using AI-based platforms tend to rely on surface-level learning strategies, seeking quick answers rather than engaging in deep, critical thinking. As a result, their knowledge remains superficial, and they may struggle to grasp the complexities and nuances required to excel in the competitive CSS examination.
Further, ChatGPT and AI’s advent has undoubtedly revolutionized how students prepare for the CSS examination. While these tools offer instant access to vast amounts of information and can assist aspirants with their queries, they have inadvertently led to a concerning level of dependency and overreliance. According to a report by the National Centre for Education Statistics, an alarming number of students displayed a heavy dependence on AI for information retrieval and exam preparation. As these AI tools provide quick and convenient access to vast amounts of data, students are prone to relying on them without developing the necessary critical thinking and research skills.
Furthermore, using ChatGPT or AI in the CSS aspirants’ learning process has led to concerns about limited knowledge retention. While these AI-powered tools undoubtedly offer convenience and accessibility, they can unintentionally foster a passive learning approach. According to an Educational Testing Service (ETS) report, ChatGPT and AI have been associated with reduced student knowledge retention. CSS aspirants use AI as a shortcut to gather information without putting in the effort to analyze and synthesize the material properly. Consequently, they may struggle to recall and apply the information effectively during the examination, hindering their overall performance and chance of success.
Last but not least, while AI tools provide immense convenience and efficiency in learning, there is a concern that they may unintentionally lead to a reduction in the exploration of unconventional topics and perspectives. With AI’s ability to quickly provide standardized answers and solutions, students might be less inclined to venture into uncharted territories or engage with alternative viewpoints. According to the Centre for Educational Research and Development (CERD) report, the AI-generated response primarily covered mainstream and widely accepted ideas, overlooking unconventional or niche perspectives. As a result, they may become less inclined to challenge the status quo and manage crucial aspects of diverse perspectives that could be essential for CSS aspirants’ holistic development.
As concerns grow over the potential impact of AI and ChatGPT on students’ creative thinking, it becomes crucial to explore effective remedial measures that can foster a balanced environment. To begin with, rather than viewing AI as a threat to creativity, education institutions can strategically integrate AI and ChatGPT as creativity-enhancing tools. Students can leverage these technologies to expand their creative thinking abilities by designing AI-powered platforms that encourage open-ended exploration and problem-solving. Moreover, these platforms can present students with challenging real-world scenarios, enabling them to brainstorm innovative solutions and collaborate with their peers. Hence, AI can analyze students’ responses and offer personalized feedback, fostering a supportive learning environment that nurtures individual creativity.
Moreover, integrating AI as a tool for creativity rather than a substitute is a forward-thinking approach to using AI and ChatGPT. By encouraging students to employ AI technology as an aid, they can explore innovative solutions to complex problems, stimulate their imagination, and expand their creative thinking abilities. In addition, rather than passively relying on AI-generated content, students and aspirants can actively engage with the technology, harnessing its power to augment their creative potential. Hence, AI becomes a powerful ally in fostering an innovative mindset, empowering students to develop unique perspectives and ideas while preserving the irreplaceable essence of human imagination.
To articulate critically, the advent of ChatGPT and AI has significantly impacted CSS aspirants’ creativity, leading to potential drawbacks. While AI tools offer instant access to vast information and aid in exam preparation, they might stifle creativity by promoting rote memorization rather than critical thinking. Aspirants may rely heavily on AI-generated answers, undermining their ability to generate unique ideas or solutions. Moreover, the convenience of AI may discourage in-depth research and exploration of diverse perspectives, limiting the development of original thought. Thus, balancing the benefits of AI with the need to nurture creativity among CSS aspirants is crucial to maintaining a well-rounded and innovative civil service.
In conclusion, the integration of ChatGPT and AI in the preparation process of CSS aspirants has led to concerns about diminishing creativity. While AI has undoubtedly provided valuable resources and instant access to information, there is a risk of overreliance on these tools, leading to a decline in critical thinking and problem-solving skills. AI’s convenience may deter aspirants from exploring unique perspectives or innovative approaches to challenges. Therefore, CSS aspirants must strike a balance, using AI to supplement their preparation rather than substitute it, ensuring their creativity and originality remain intact.
CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays
Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers
Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Miss Iqra Ali & Dr Nishat Baloch, Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students. General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers