Economic Growth without Distributive Justice breeds Violence | Editorials by CSS & PMS Aspirants
The following article, “Economic Growth without Distributive Justice breeds Violence”, is written by Soonh, a student of Sir Syed Kazim Ali. Moreover, the article is written on the same pattern, taught by Sir to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. Sir Kazim has uploaded his students’ solved past paper questions so other thousands of aspirants can understand how to crack a topic or question, how to write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.
Economic growth is often heralded as the cornerstone of national prosperity, driving industrial expansion, job creation, and technological advancement. However, when this growth is not accompanied by distributive justice – the fair allocation of wealth and opportunities – it catalyzes social unrest in society. Thus, history has shown that societies where economic benefits remain concentrated in the hands of a few who struggle with inequality and are more prone to violence, instability, and discontent.
Moving forward, to understand the consequences of unchecked economic growth, examining how the absence of distributive justice fuels inequality, erodes social cohesion, and ignites unrest is crucial, as discussed in this article below.
The Unchecked Consequences of Economic Growth Without Distributive Justice
To begin with, economic growth generates wealth; however, its benefits often remain concentrated within a privileged few, which creates a stark divide between the affluent and the marginalized. As a result, without fair policies to ensure growth, which translates into broader social and economic uplift, resentment festers among those left behind and – eventually – leads to societal instability. For instance, one of the most striking examples of economic disparity that, without distributive justice, leads to violence is Rwanda’s 1994 genocide, where deep-rooted economic competition between the Hutu and Tutsi populations exacerbated ethnic tensions, culminating in mass killings. This proves that economic policies that disproportionately favored one group over another heightened society’s frustration and hostility, with large-scale atrocities ensuing in it.
Similarly, the Arab Spring revolutions across the Middle East were not solely political movements; economic grievances – including high unemployment, inequality, and corruption – largely drove them. Therefore, the lack of economic justice created an environment where frustration transformed into mass protests, destabilizing entire nations. Hence, economic growth that fails to address inequality does not create stability; instead, it breeds tension, resentment, and, ultimately, violent uprisings.
Furthermore, economic growth without distributive justice weakens social cohesion and erodes institutional legitimacy. Undeniably, this economic inequality becomes a structural threat to democracy and governance. When governments prioritize policies that favor the elite at the expense of the majority, citizens lose trust in institutions and resort to protest or, in extreme cases, violence. For example, Venezuela’s economic crisis is a case study that shows extreme economic disparity and mismanagement cracking a nation. Once a prosperous oil-rich country, Venezuela’s wealth was concentrated among the ruling elite. As a result, inflation skyrocketed, and basic necessities became scarce. Consequently, widespread protests erupted as citizens took to the streets to demand economic justice, which led to civil unrest; repression; and violent crackdowns by security forces. Thus, this breakdown of institutional credibility directly results from unchecked economic disparity, proving that economic growth alone cannot ensure stability; it must be equitably distributed to maintain public trust.
In addition, the failure to ensure economic justice significantly contributes to rising crime rates, particularly in urban centers plagued by high-income disparity. Notably, countries, such as Brazil and South Africa, known for their vast wealth gaps, suffer from high rates of violent crime – including gang violence, robberies, and homicides. Indeed, studies indicate that when young people lack economic opportunities due to systemic inequalities, they become more susceptible to criminal activities as a means of survival. Therefore, this correlation between economic disparity and urban violence highlights the dangers of an economy that prioritizes growth over equitable distribution.
Moreover, economic injustice reinforces racial and ethnic wage disparities, creating deeper divisions within society. For instance, in the United States (US), African-American and Hispanic communities earn significantly less than their white counterparts despite comparable levels of education and experience. Because systemic barriers – discriminatory hiring practices and unequal access to opportunities – have ensured that wealth remains concentrated within certain racial demographics, the socio-economic divide continues to widen. As a consequence, these disparities fuel racial tensions, which contribute to protests and movements demanding economic justice. In essence, when economic growth is not inclusive, it exacerbates racial inequality and fosters an environment where unrest and discontent flourish.
Do Free Markets and Growth Alone Ensure Equity?
However, some argue that free markets are sufficient to drive economic prosperity, competition, and efficiency. To support this view, advocates of capitalism often assert that market-driven economies generate jobs; stimulate investment; and create wealth, which lift millions out of poverty. However, when left unregulated, free markets tend to concentrate wealth among the elite, exacerbating inequality rather than reducing it. For example, the unchecked dominance of multinational corporations, such as Amazon and Google, shows that wealth consolidation at the top leaves little room for equitable wage distribution. Therefore, without intervention, economic systems naturally favor those with existing capital, reinforcing a cycle of privilege while marginalizing the working class.
Likewise, another perspective suggests that economic growth provides governments the resources to address inequalities over time, negating the need for immediate distributive justice measures. According to this view, as economies expand, wealth naturally trickles down to lower-income groups, which eventually improves their standard of living. Nevertheless, the delayed implementation of economic justice has historically led to hardened social divisions; political polarization; and mass disillusionment. For example, South Africa’s post-apartheid economic policies depict that economic growth alone does not resolve deep-seated inequalities. Even though significant GDP growth occurred in the years following apartheid, the wealth gap between Black and white South Africans has remained vast, fueling resentment and unrest. Thus, while economic growth generates resources, delaying distributive justice only deepens social divisions, which makes equitable wealth distribution even more challenging in the long run.
Case Studies That Prove the Perils of Economic Growth Without Equity
Stepping ahead, history is replete with examples of how economic growth, when not equitably distributed, leads to unrest and violence. To illustrate, Nigeria’s oil wealth paradox highlights that resource-rich nations struggle with severe inequality and instability when economic benefits fail to reach the wider population. Despite being one of Africa’s largest oil producers, Nigeria suffers from extreme poverty, unemployment, and corruption, which fuel insurgencies such as Boko Haram. Since failing to invest in equitable economic policies has left millions disillusioned, economic prosperity at the top thus does not automatically translate into national stability.
Similarly, the decline of the Rust Belt in the United States (US) underlines the uneven economic growth that leads to political upheaval. Because the collapse of manufacturing jobs in states like Michigan and Ohio left thousands unemployed, little governmental intervention guaranteed economic justice. As a result, poor distribution of wealth fueled resentment, ultimately contributing to the rise of populist movements and widespread political polarization in the country.
Therefore, these cases reaffirm that economic growth without distributive justice does not construct a prosperous society; it generates frustration, division, and – eventually – backlash.
Ensuring Growth and Distributive Justice
To prevent economic growth from becoming a source of violence, policymakers must adopt progressive taxation systems that ensure wealth is redistributed fairly. Notably, countries like Sweden have successfully implemented high taxation on the wealthy to fund universal healthcare; education; and social security, thus reducing the country’s economic disparity while maintaining strong economic growth.
Additionally, strengthening judicial systems and eliminating barriers to legal aid are essential steps toward ensuring economic justice. For example, countries like Denmark have invested in accessible legal frameworks that provide workers’ rights, fair wages, and social protections upheld without bias.
Furthermore, governments must prioritize inclusive economic policies that offer equal opportunities for all citizens – regardless of race, class, or background. In fact, nations such as Norway have successfully integrated social welfare programs with economic policies, which proves that equitable wealth distribution does not hinder economic progress but enhances it.
The Urgency of Equitable Economic Policies
In summary, economic growth must be equitably distributed to prevent social unrest and violence. Given that the failure to implement distributive justice fosters resentment; weakens institutions; and fuels instability, progress cannot be measured solely by GDP growth. Ultimately, economic expansion can only translate into genuine stability, social cohesion, and long-term progress by ensuring distributive justice.
CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays
Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.
CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers
Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Miss Iqra Ali & Dr Nishat Baloch, Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students. General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers
