Failure of ChatGPT To Provide Evidence Required To Aspirants | Daily Writeup | Opinions
The following article, “ChatGPT Fails To Provide Relevant Evidence Required To Qualify for CSS And PMS”, is written by Shumaila Majeed, a student of Sir Syed Kazim Ali. Moreover, the article is written on the same pattern, taught by Sir to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. Sir Kazim has uploaded his students’ solved past paper questions so other thousands of aspirants can understand how to crack a topic or question, how to write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.
Humans have advanced in digitalization and Artificial Intelligence (AI), and thanks to great minds, being mediocre is no longer accepted. So, if an average mind is not in demand, the only option is to increase his rational and analytical capabilities by roaming in different educational search engines. To make it easier, one of the primary Artificial Intelligence (AI) research organizations in the world has introduced, in uncomplicated jargon, ChatGPT, an innovative Artificial Intelligence (AI) linguistic model. Its users, though, increasing with each passing day; this invention has raised many concerns about the security of human intelligence and critical thinking. Gauging the elusive aspect of ChatGPT, multiple questions have been raised, such as whether it will replace humans’ rationality, provide relevant evidence, or authenticate a statement by generating proofs. Moreover, to inculcate its dependents, numerous academic writers, bloggers, students, tutors, and aspirants preparing for competitive examinations are incrementing their reliance on it worldwide. And again, the issue of the providence of relevant information is mounting, questioning the critical abilities of users. Regarding Pakistan, the trend of reliance on ChatGPT is on the rise, particularly among CSS and PMS aspirants. Presently, it is one of the primary disquietudes in Pakistan that hundreds and thousands of aspirants are building their analytical abilities through research and evidence to qualify in English essays relaying on ChatGPT, and, here, chances of their failure surge. However, before digging further into the relevant evidence provided by ChatGPT that is required to qualify for competitive examination, particularly to ace CSS and PMS essays, it is obligatory to apprehend ChatGPT’s working and shortcomings regarding generating germane data on subjects.
ChatGPT is an advanced deep learning system designed to comprehend, scrutinize, and produce human-like language, making it one of the most potent conversational AI tools available today; nonetheless, it has sparked debates about its potential implications for education. For instance, according to “The SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: “Implications for Educational Practice and Research” by Mohammadreza Farrokhnia, “ChatGPT can increase access to information and decline teaching workload, thereby making crucial processes and errands more efficient; still, the weaknesses are the lack of deep understanding and higher-order thinking skills to provide relevant evidence, which not only threatening academic integrity but also declining efficient cognitive skills.” Marching toward a more critical point and relating it to the probability of CSS and PMS essay qualification, if ChatGPT cannot produce real-time evidence, the rate of failure of competitive aspirants is burgeoning, even risking their future. In addition, Shen Zheng et al., in their research study, “Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Providing Truthful Answers?” has pinpointed three critical abilities associated with QA failures: knowledge memorization, knowledge recall, and knowledge reasoning. Here, the lack of ChatGPT in imparting knowledge reasoning reflects its inability to provide relevant evidence. Now, thoughtful individuals, particularly competitive examination aspirants, can sense the insufficient data given on the AI platform. Similarly, a research article by Ali Borji, “A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures”, while stressing “A Comprehensive Analysis of ChatGPT’s Fiascos”, discusses various lacking reasoning and factual errors. As a matter of fact, ChatGPT, in defiance of securing the central point in academics and other sectors, possesses numerous loopholes that are causing students who are preparing for the examinations, such as Central Superior Services (CSS) and Provincial Management Services (PMS), fall behind in providing relevant evidence- which has a sine-qua-non importance to qualify them.
Also, another concern has been raised regarding the connection between providing meagre and irrelevant evidence by ChatGPT and the chances of CSS and PMS aspirants failing in essays. It is a general assumption every state has a specific pattern apropos to each examination, and the same goes for the Pakistan examination scheme, including CSS and PMS essays. Their essays demand a verified set of evidence and relevant data to prove one’s stance on a particular topic to succeed in it. If students in CSS and PMS examinations cannot give proper and appropriate evidence to prove their statements, stances, or points of view, their chances of failure often rise. Apparently, apprentices’ over-reliance on ChatGPT causes them to lag behind in effectively cracking CSS and PMS essays. In other words, ChatGPT fails to offer relevant evidence required to qualify for CSS and PMS essays.
Analyzing it critically, ChatGPT’s ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate responses to open-ended questions or prompts in the field of science, commerce, and particularly in education has provided a colossal amount of knowledge and reduced the burden on academic instructors, yet it does not emerge without insecurities. Artificial intelligence opens up a debate about whether it is safe for students, online examinations, or candidates whose analytical abilities and the providence of relevant evidence on a specific issue possess the utmost importance to qualify for a subject. Moreover, one of the significant problems in its usage is that it needs to generate the relevant information required for competitive examinations, such as CSS and PMS essays.
Conclusively, in Pakistan, the number of ChatGPT users is gradually increasing, and most of its users are CSS and PMS aspirants. Verily, aspirants’ increasing dependency on ChatGPT makes them more dependent on a cooked information recipe that needs more relevant evidence. Suppose it is not tackled effectively, and aspirants for competitive exams do not change their behaviour to gain knowledge with germane evidence from ChatGPT. In that case, students definitely will be at a loss. In conclusion, there is a dire necessity to change the conduct while preparing for CSS. PMS essays’ teachers and students must build consensus to be sustained only partially by ChatGPT. They should explore other options to verify their stance by rational evidence, and indeed, success does not demand blind mimicry or read-made material but reasoning, justification, and hard work.
CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays
Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers
Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Miss Iqra Ali & Dr Nishat Baloch, Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students. General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers