CSS 2006 Solved Current Affairs Past Papers | Anti-Blasphemy Campaign Launched by Muslims
The following question of CSS Current Affairs 2006 is solved by Sir Ammar Hashmi, the best Current Affairs Coach, on the guided pattern of Sir Syed Kazim Ali, which he taught to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. This solved past paper question is uploaded to help aspirants understand how to crack a topic or question, write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.
Question breakdown:
This question has one part, i.e., the role that the UN and the OIC can play in preventing the recurrence of acts of blasphemy in the future.
Outline
1-Introduction
2-Contextualizing the Anti-Blasphemy Campaign
3-The Dichotomy Between Religious Sensitivity and Freedom of Expression
4-Analyzing the Muslim-Western Confrontation
- ✓Islamic Doctrinal Perspective on Blasphemy
- ✓Western Philosophical Commitment to Free Speech
5-The United Nations Potential Role in Conflict Resolution
- ✓Facilitating Cross-Cultural and Ideological Reconciliation
- ✓Drafting and Promulgating International Normative Guidelines
- ✓Institutional Mechanisms for Monitoring and Intervention
6-The Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s Strategic Contributions
- ✓Advocacy for Global Recognition of Religious Sanctity
- ✓Diplomatic Engagement and Policy Advocacy
- ✓Educational and Cultural Initiatives
7-Strategic Preventive Measures to Mitigate Future Blasphemy Incidents
- ✓Global Initiatives for Interfaith and Cultural Understanding
- ✓Enhancement of International Legal Structures
- ✓Promoting Ethical Journalism and Media Accountability
8-Critical Analysis
9-Conclusion
Introduction
As the world becomes more interconnected, cultural and ideological differences occasionally navigate the in-between worlds in ways that can lead to friction across communities with different values and beliefs. A campaign of rabid anti-blasphemy being organized by Muslim communities worldwide has come into conflict with Western principles of freedom of expression perceived by many to be fundamental human rights. However, this has created considerable tension, with one sector calling for respect for religious sanctity and the other insisting on safeguarding press and expression rights. By looking at the philosophical and cultural grounds on which it has developed, the underlying roots of this confrontation can be better understood, on the one hand concerning the Islamic doctrinal stance on blasphemy and the other concerning the Western commitment to free speech. In this regard, the U.N. and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) have been restraining conflict and combining respect. A role as a global body would help facilitate cross-cultural reconciliation, set normative guidelines and develop a platform for incoming incidents to be resolved at the diplomatic level. At the same time, the OIC can protect religious convictions, attach conversations, and promote educational initiatives until these cultural gaps are bridged. Promoting interfaith understanding, strengthening international networks, and advocating for ethical journalism constitute future preventive measures to scale down on cases of offence and conflict. It puts in place the need for combined global cooperation to prevent additional polarization and tackle the delicate problem, where an equal approach is required that considers both religious respect and the principle of free expression.
Contextualizing the Anti-Blasphemy Campaign
In response to perceived disrespect or offensive portrayals of Islamic beliefs and to counteract Western media, the international anti-blasphemy campaign headlined by Muslim communities has emerged. Incidents like the publication of controversial cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in Denmark in 2005 led to large-scale protests. They illustrated the deep-rooted issues of cultural and religious sensitivities in Muslim societies about drawing religious figures. Muslims take offence to blasphemy as an affront to Muslims’ faith and as a personal and spiritual offence which challenges Islamic values and their integrity. Therefore, it has moved from being a series of isolated protests to being an emblem of a more significant movement for the respect of religious beliefs in a single world that is more and more secular. The heart of the anti-blasphemy movement is aimed at addressing what many Muslims in the world have viewed as a pattern of insensitivity, if not hostility, in the West’s treatment of Islam. As a result, this campaign is not a simple response to specific events but a plea for a more respectful gesture towards different cultural and religious approaches and for taking concrete steps to start the critical discussion about how both of these worldviews can live together, and indeed, comfortably so, without interfering with fundamental liberties.
The Dichotomy Between Religious Sensitivity and Freedom of Expression
The central role played in the Muslim—Western conflict over blasphemy was a fundamental dichotomy between the sacredness of religious beliefs and the right to freedom of expression. Offending revered figures, including the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), can be taken as blasphemous by Muslim communities as it is a means by which personal beliefs are violated, as well as societal and cultural integrity threatened. Islam teaches excellent respect for religious symbols and particularly forbids blasphemous actions for the crime of which both social and moral accountability are taken. In other words, however, many Western societies embrace freedom of expression as an essential prerequisite to individual rights and often view that as the right to challenge, question, and even satirize ideas, including religious ones. This commitment to free speech rests on the embryo; the heritage of Western legal and philosophical traditions mandates freedom or autonomy (outside of molestation) of the individual to express opinions. As a result, it has seen polarizing debates. One side feels they cannot budge, their values are off the table, and the other feels they must hold their values above compromise. One solution, however, is challenging under these principles because any solution must respect cultural and religious beliefs and protect the freedom of individuals, which makes for compassionate and respectful conversation.
Analyzing the Muslim-Western Confrontation
- ✓ Islamic Doctrinal Perspective on Blasphemy
According to Islamic teachings, blaspheming is a grave offence against religious symbols recognized as sacred, including the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The basis of this belief is formed by the Quran and Hadith, which demand that Muslims respect the icons of religion. To many Muslims, blasphemy is not just a personal offence of faith but an offence to the ethical and spiritual fabric of Islamic society, of moral and cultural importance to the community. Therefore, acts of blasphemy are viewed as transgressions which merit moral accountability, and the global anti‐blasphemy campaign is addressing what many Muslims regard as the erosion of the respect owed to them.
- ✓ Western Philosophical Commitment to Free Speech
However, freedom of expression is typically considered a sacrosanct right in Western societies, rooted in Enlightenment philosophy emphasizing individual liberty and freedom. It was written into the foundational documents, like the U.S. In their invocation of free speech provisions contained in the First Amendment and European human rights conventions that treat free speech as a vital element of democratic society. The freedom to critique or satirize, perhaps even religious symbols, is frequently considered a logical expression of one’s thought. So, Western countries consider such restrictions on expression, especially in the media and journalism, to contravene the principles of the object society. This commitment to free speech is deeply seated within the culture, evidenced by its frequent clash with calls for respect to religion — as both sides feel their perspective is constitutive to their identity and moral values.
The United Nations Potential Role in Conflict Resolution
- ✓ Facilitating Cross-Cultural and Ideological Reconciliation
An organization mandated to operate within a uniquely diverse world front, the United Nations is ideally placed to unite unique cultural and ideological groups for discussion. Another U.N. effort to connect the Muslim world and the West is the U.N. Alliance of Civilizations, founded in 2005 by then-UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan. The alliance seeks to ‘bring together actors from governments, intergovernmental and civil society organizations on an equal footing to forge alliances that can improve understanding and cohesion within and between nations and societies.’ In particular, and among others, interfaith dialogues and cultural exchanges have taken place on this platform to spread the culture of understanding and sensitivity to cultural differences. Expanding such initiatives would give the U.N. a diplomatic space where representatives from countries where Muslims are in the majority and from Western countries talk about their differences in a constructive manner and resolve to show mutual respect.
- ✓ Drafting and Promulgating International Normative Guidelines
The U.N. could draw up normative guidelines about the appropriate public discourse on religious matters to minimize religious sensitivities that may lead to conflicts. The U.N., for example, contextualized the 2005 Danish cartoons featuring Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), stressing responsibility in speech and respect for all faiths that followed the global backlash to this issue. In the U.N.’s case, this approach can be further developed, adding suggestions as to how they should recommend public media, which should be conducive to respect and press freedom while considering the sensitivities of the different religions. The U.N. would promote a framework to set a tone of respect and recognize free speech rights.
- ✓ Institutional Mechanisms for Monitoring and Intervention
The U.N. could be set up to check situations that create religious tensions and take action to control the situation before it goes out of control. A model for this approach can be seen in the work of the U.N. Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect: They monitor early warning signs and are working to stave off violence born of religious or ethnic hate. Building an observatory that focuses on religious and cultural sensitivities rather than on technologies could be construed as an observatory that the U.N. could use to respond to possible tensions before they arise diplomatically and not have to respond piecemeal.
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s Strategic Contributions
- ✓ Advocacy for Global Recognition of Religious Sanctity
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation has been leading the effort as the voice of the 57-member nation where most of the population are Muslims to promote respect for international religious beliefs. As in the case of the Danish cartoons in 2005 and subsequent portrayal in European media, OIC has urged the United Nations and other international organizations to devise international rules to help prevent such incidents. One can remember that through the activities of the OIC, the U.N. also approved the resolution ‘Combating Defamation of Religions’ during the mid-20th century, proving the OIC’s effectiveness in raising religious issues at the international level. With this, the OIC has been very interested in preserving the Islamic identity signs and increasing the understanding of tolerance across the globe.
- ✓ Diplomatic Engagement and Policy Advocacy
Moreover, the OIC has participated in active diplomacy by opening dialogues with Western governments and other Western media organizations on the cultural issues raised by blasphemous content. Immediately after the publication of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons, for example, the OIC coordinated talks with the European Union to ensure that European firms approached cultural responsibilities in media portrayals with more outstanding care. It is not just symbolic outreach: In several Western countries, not least those that participated in the Olympics with empty flags, the outreach has prompted policy discussions about the balance between freedom of expression and respect for other cultures. The OIC’s diplomatic work on this demonstrates a willingness to engage constructively rather than quash free expression, and it also shows an appropriate response to handling delicate religious questions.
- ✓ Educational and Cultural Initiatives
Realizing that only education plays a crucial role in long-term understanding, OIC has launched many initiatives to bridge cultural chasms. Its ‘OIC Cultural Strategy for the Islamic World’ aims to raise awareness and tolerance levels through intercultural education programmes, museum exhibitions, and collaborative research on Islamic history and civilization. The goal of these initiatives is to decrease ignorance and stereotypes of Islam, as was evident more strongly in Western societies. Through education and cultural exchange, the OIC hopes to build at least some atmosphere of mutual respect to avoid future clay pigeon incidents such as the latest perceived blasphemy.
Strategic Preventive Measures to Mitigate Future Blasphemy Incidents
- ✓ Global Initiatives for Interfaith and Cultural Understanding
Reducing the risk of blasphemous incidents and creating a respectful global culture that will promote interfaith dialogue and cultural exchange is, in fact, necessary. The UN-sponsored program “World Interfaith Harmony Week” is just one of the programs designed to give different religions the stage to engage in constructive dialogue, celebrate their commonalities and learn from their differences. Extending these programs can build cultural sensitivity and foster an environment in which respect is shown for others, and taking action likely to offend due to religious reasons is avoided.
- ✓ Enhancement of International Legal Structures
The United Nations needs to work with international bodies to develop a framework of how to balance freedom of expression with respect for religious sensitivities (and, more significantly maybe, freedom of religion) and to render some criminal thoughts and slap people over the knuckles in other countries the way we do in our own. One way to achieve this is to model this situation after specific national laws exist to curb hate speech and incitement without infringing on free speech. For example, in his Rabat Plan of Action, the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights provides guidelines regarding what speech should be prohibited to incite hatred and what imposes the need to respect religious beliefs without unnecessary censorship being imposed. The U.N. could encourage countries to adopt similar protocols in terms of religious tolerance to help prevent themselves from committing inflammatory acts that may be offensive to religious groups. This is a balanced approach, which (while not stifling freedom of expression) will encourage respectful communication and serve as a basis for respectful speaking about sensitive topics.
- ✓ Promoting Ethical Journalism and Media Accountability
It is necessary to prevent misunderstandings and offensive portrayals, promote responsible media practices, and encourage ethical journalism. The International Federation of Journalists has set guidelines concerning reporting sensitive cultural and religious subjects for accuracy, respect, and more. Press councils of some sort, or regulatory, do not necessarily call them global guidelines. However, expanding such guidelines globally and encouraging adherence would create more of an ethical approach to reporting on religious things. On the one hand, these measures aim to foster media accountability that would balance the freedom of the press with respect for religious belief and, on the other hand, to protect press freedom.
Critical Analysis
Both the United Nations and the Organization for Islamic Cooperation provide avenues to prevent the recurrence of blasphemy incidents yet face a difficult balance between seeking religious respect and ensuring freedom of expression. On the one hand, the U.N. could be the body that fosters interfaith dialogue, develops respectful guidelines and creates monitoring mechanisms, offering a structured impartial approach to dealing with religious sensitivities at a global level and one with the public appeal and standing characteristic of the U.N. processes. Nevertheless, the success of such initiatives is often hampered by the fact that the cultural, political and legal values attached to free speech and religious sanctity differ among member states and reaching a consensus would be a challenge. OIC’s effort to promote respect for religious beliefs globally is valuable. However, OIC’s advocacy on problems concerning Muslims at times undermines its universality and the weight of what it says widely in Western countries where freedom of expression remains a significant value. International guidelines, educational programs, and legal frameworks could promote mutual respect, but implementing these, even when constructive, would need to be carried out with diplomacy and flexibility in order to refrain from eroding rights or fomenting resistance. These two last organizations must, in the end, decide how to create standards that are reasonable, universally respected, and biased as little as possible against blasphemy concerns whilst accommodating a truly global range of views on religion and free speech.
Conclusion
To conclude, the recent friction between Muslim communities and Western nations over blasphemy and free speech issues highlights the need for a way forward that honours the sacred and publishes the profane as economically competitive and culturally available to all. Dialogue, responsible expression, and the advocacy of policies that reflect religious tenets and respect Western societies’ valued rights rests with the United Nations and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Their rules governing respectful discourse, public forums for diplomacy, and education programs can be used as a check that can prevent even the slightest problems from becoming those which threaten to divide us further. In the end, a harmonious global community in which diverse values can exist side by side can only be achieved if mutual understanding is finally possible based on a foundation of cultural respect and carefully drafted international norms.
CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays
Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.
CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers
Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students.
General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers
