CSS 2010 Solved Current Affairs Past Paper | Jewish settlements in Palestinian territories
The following question of CSS Current Affairs 2010 is solved by Sir Ammar Hashmi, the best Current Affairs Coach, on the guided pattern of Sir Syed Kazim Ali, which he taught to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. This solved past paper question is uploaded to help aspirants understand how to crack a topic or question, write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.
Question breakdown
This question requires an analysis of the Jewish settlements in the Palestinian territories.
Outline
1-Introduction
2-Background of the Jewish Settlements
3-Controversy and International Legal Status
- ✓Illegal under international law, violating the Fourth Geneva Convention
- ✓Israeli justification based on security and historical rights
- ✓Global condemnation from the UN and other international bodies
4-Impact on the Peace Process
- ✓The obstacle to the two-state solution is the fragmented Palestinian territory
- ✓The Palestinian demand for a settlement freeze before any peace talks
5-Political and Societal Implications
- ✓Increased violence between settlers and Palestinian communities.
- ✓Growing international criticism of Israeli policies on settlements
- ✓Erosion of Palestinian Trust in the Peace Process
6-Critical Analysis
7-Conclusion
Answer to the Question
Introduction
The question of Jewish settlements in the territories where Palestinians are populated is one of the most burning questions in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The establishment of these settlements started after the Six–Day War in 1967, which dramatically transformed the territories of the West Bank and East Jerusalem and has provoked global condemnation and created a multitude of demographic and political issues in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Controversies around such settlements are pertinent to their legal standing, and this is usually a contentious issue, as the UN, most notably, has claimed that such settlements contravene Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention by transferring an occupying power’s population to the occupied territory. However, Israel supports its actions through historical rights as well as the security regime, which again strengthens the argument. These settlements, in turn, had a significant impact on the general peace process since they continue to create enclaves on the Palestinian territories, making the two-state solution virtually impossible to implement, and it does more harm by pausing the negotiation processes since the leaders of the Palestinians call for a halt to the settlements. Apart from political aspects, the settlements raise social consequences in such a way that they lead to mostly violent interactions between settlers and Palestinians and have worsened Israel’s international diplomacy. In conclusion, the settlements represent the Jewish people, which remains one of the main challenges to the crisis solution due to the dispute over land and power in the Middle East.
Background of the Jewish Settlements
The provenance of the Jewish settlements in Palestinian territories can be traced back to the late 19th century under the Ottoman Empire’s time of Jewish immigration. From the period of the Ottoman Empire’s collapse and the British Mandate management period, this movement grew solely because Zionist dreams encouraged the formation of Jewish settlements in the country of Palestine. They would expand further, however, and it was not until after the 1967 Six-Day War, when Israel captured the West Bank and East Jerusalem, that expansion would begin. Israel has since promoted settlement growth, saying there are security concerns and historical ties to the land. The conflict is thus deeply staked in the Israeli Palestinian region’s history, as is the settlement movement.
Controversy and International Legal Status
- ✓ Illegal under international law, violating the Fourth Geneva Convention
The Jewish settlement in the Palestinian territories is broadly unlawful because it violates the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention. This convention also does not allow the occupying power to transfer parts of its population into the occupied territory, something that has been done to the West Bank and East Jerusalem. UN has supported this position, stating that the settlements pose a threat to the rights of the Palestinian people, besides threatening the stability of the region.
- ✓ Israeli justification based on security and historical rights
Moreover, to justify its settlement policy, Israel has used security and biblical connection to the land as reasons for its action. Representatives of the Israeli government state that the settlements serve the purpose of security and are native to the area due to historical references going back to biblical times. This rationale is within a larger discourse that asserts settlements as necessary for states and a response to historical rights, even as the global community rejects it.
- ✓ Global condemnation from the UN and other international bodies
Furthermore, the international community has disapproved of the settlements, with different organizations critiquing them and urging an end. The UN and many countries regard the settlements as an enormous barrier to resolving the conflict, as they alter the realities on the ground. Similar global disapproval is valid regarding unlawful settlements, which are provocative and preemptive of negotiations.
Impact on the Peace Process
- ✓ Obstacle to the two-state solution, fragmenting Palestinian territory
The main obstacle to the two-state solution is Jewish settlements because they split Palestinian land. These settlements are mostly strategically placed to fragment the territorial contiguity of Palestine and complicate the geographical cohesion of a functional Palestinian state. This fragmentation removes any practical possibility of a two-state solution because the international system no longer recognizes how one can realistically draw clear borders to create a unified Palestinian state.
- ✓ Palestinian demand for a settlement freeze before any peace talks
Additionally, Palestinian leaders have repeatedly insisted that Israel freeze all settlement activity as a precondition to peace talks. Palestinians view it as a direct encroachment on the land and as a sign that it is no longer committed to actual negotiations. This is the deep underlying concern, not just about whether continued settlement growth might lock us into a very hard-to-achieve fair and lasting peace, but about turning a demand – a demand to end settlement in the occupied territories, to stop settlement expansion, and to get the army and the police out of the streets – into a demand for expulsion of an entire people and the liquidation of their statehood.
Political and Societal Implications
- ✓ Increased violence between settlers and Palestinian communities.
Through the years of Jewish settlement expansion, the stakes have become higher, and the violence, which is shared between settlers and Palestinian communities, has become frequent. Conflicts can include battles, clashes, acts of destruction, and vandalism of property. Therefore, the continuation of violence only widens cleavages and cultivates acrimony that throws a spanner in the works of any chance of harmonisation, not to mention coexistence, in the region.
- ✓ Growing international criticism of Israeli policies on settlements
While the settlers’ expansion of settlements continues to be on the rise, the world has continued noting one or the other indignation from other countries or international organizations due to its violation of international and human rights law. It has led to a diplomatic conflict, sanctions, and boycotts, and all these expose Israel to diplomatic isolation. Hence, the settlement policy is the object of international condemnation, and the consequences have been observed in the diplomatic facet of the nation.
- ✓ Erosion of Palestinian Trust in the Peace Process
The peace process has lost much Palestinian trust as a result of the ongoing expansion of Jewish settlements. Palestinian reaction to settlement activity is that it is a signal that Israel is not genuinely committed to a fair resolution of the conflict. Some public opinion also shows growing mistrust of negotiations, not because they will not be effective, but because they seem to have little chance. With ever-widening settlements, Palestinians doubt that peaceful coexistence is either possible or desirable as social relations become ever more fraught and support for any diplomacy ever more elusive.
Critical Analysis
To critical analysis, the Israeli–Palestinian conflict remains fundamentally uncertain because Jewish settlements in Palestinian territories continue to be a source of profound contention. These settlements are viewed widely from a legal perspective as violations of international law, especially taking into account the ramifications on Palestinian rights and sovereignty. But it represents a view of security and historical entitlement, which has deep roots inside Israel’s society. This dichotomy between legal interpretations and ideological beliefs complicates things and keeps the process going. It also extends the potential viability of a two-state solution, and widening settlements contribute to continually entrenched divisions and enhanced resentment on both sides. In the face of many international calls to halt settlement activities, Israel’s policies are essentially unchanged, which suggests that any resolution will have to address not just the legal but also the ideological and political.
Conclusion
To conclude, the issue of Jewish settlements, however, in the Palestinian territories is deeply rooted and very complex and serves to fuel the tensions. Much of the international community views these settlements as significant barriers to peace and condemns them legally, which erodes Palestinian trust in the negotiation process. However, Israel justifies the settlements as necessary for security and based on historical claims that, on the other hand, have caused condemnation and diplomatic isolation from the international and UN communities. The continued growth of settlement expansion not only curtails the prospects for a two-state solution but also contributes to the confusion of social and political realities in both Israeli and Palestinian societies. In short, to address this issue, a nuanced approach will be necessary that reconciles legal, ideological, and political dimensions, calling for a renewed commitment to pursuing a peaceful resolution.
CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays
Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.
CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved Current Affairs Past Papers
Looking for the last fifteen years of CSS Solved Current Affairs to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Pakistan’s top CSS Current Affairs coach having the highest score of their students.
CSS Solved Current Affairs
CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers
Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students.
General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers
