CSS 2012 Solved Current Affairs Past Papers | Impact of Foreign Aid on Pakistan in Post 9/11 scenario
The following question of CSS Current Affairs 2012 is solved by Sir Ammar Hashmi, the best Current Affairs Coach, on the guided pattern of Sir Syed Kazim Ali, which he taught to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. This solved past paper question is uploaded to help aspirants understand how to crack a topic or question, write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.
Question Breakdown
This question has one part, i.e., a discussion of the impact of foreign aid on Pakistan in the post-9/11 scenario.
Outline
1-Introduction
2-Background: Foreign Aid and Pakistan’s Historical Context Post-9/11
3-Positive Impacts of Foreign Aid in the Post-9/11 Era
- ✓Increased foreign reserves and infrastructure development
- ✓Enhanced political alliances and counterterrorism capabilities
- ✓Better access to healthcare and education for communities
4-Negative Impacts of Foreign Aid in the Post-9/11 Era
- ✓Rising national debt and overreliance on external funding
- ✓Loss of sovereignty due to donor conditions
- ✓Increased social division and polarization over foreign alliances
5-From Benefactor to Burden: A Critical Reflection on Foreign Aid Dynamics After 9/11
6-Conclusion
Introduction
The events of September 11, 2001, are considered a milestone in world politics and again for Pakistan, becoming the ally in the war on terrorism. In this regard, aid rose sharply as the international community went out of its way to maintain stability and improve Pakistan’s ability to fight terrorism. A brief historical analysis of the aid given to the nation shows that while they have been a source of support, they have also created dependency. Since the attacks of 9/11, foreign aid has been worth the costs in several ways, as it has increased foreign reserves, infrastructure development, and the expansion of other crucial needs such as healthcare and education. However, undesirable consequences are associated with the mentioned advantages: increased national debt, dependence on extramural financing, and dependent sovereignty conditioned by donor restrictions. Moreover, the amount of aid has intensified the social cleavage and has stirred up controversy around the subject of the relations between Pakistan and Western countries. This is an important shift from being supposed to be on the receiving end of international benevolence to being shielded from the hard knocks of receiving such help. Therefore, only through comprehending the changes and continuities of foreign aid in Pakistan after 9/11 the emergent paradigms of the post-9/11 could be further behind; the relation of those paradigms to Pakistan’s economy, polity and social fabric, and most importantly, the need of transition from the current model of foreign aid to a more mutual, sustainable and coherent paradigm in future.
Background: Foreign Aid and Pakistan’s Historical Context Post-9/11
After the September 11, 2001, incident in the United States, Pakistan became an active player in the War on Terror that shifted the dynamics of the foreign aid system of this country. The country’s strategic geographical location, having borders with Afghanistan in particular, made it very important for the Western world especially the United States, in their counterterrorism operation. This got much attention, which caused more funding to flow into Pakistan through counterterrorism finance and military and infrastructural support, totalling billions of dollars. For instance, the Aid relationship was cemented when the United States established the Coalition Support Fund (CSF), which was meant to pay for Pakistan’s expenses in counter-insurgency operations. On the same note, through ADC loans, international organisations such as the International Monetary Fund IMF supported Pakistan’s economy during its volatile state. However, this inflow of aid was conditional; Pakistan had to change its guard and start shifting its strategic allegiance to the US doctrinal paths. These changes sparked the structural transformation of Pakistan’s domestic and economic policies to play a role in regional and global security simultaneously, as while it was active, its internal was unstable. Hence, the post-9/11 period is identifiable as a millennial in Pakistan’s history, through which foreign aid was regularly seen as an aspect of the nation’s strategic interest and associated with global geopolitics.
Positive Impacts of Foreign Aid in the Post-9/11 Era
- ✓Increased foreign reserves and infrastructure development
The foreign aid that Pakistan received in the post-9/11 period helped increase the foreign exchange reserves and also played a very active role in the development of infrastructures in almost all the fields in Pakistan. Significant foreign funding sources from the international community bolstered Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves. Consequently, the government can seek solutions to address immediate concerns of fiscal deficits during fluctuating times of the year. At the same time, it assisted in the starting and completing necessary construction works that touched upon the top-priority development of the country. For example, in the transport subsector, the development activities embraced the construction/reconstruction of highways, bridges, railways and so on, aimed at improving accessibility and transport networks within the country and with other nations. Likewise, foreign-financed projects in the power sector, including generating power projects and upgrading the national power grids, meet chronic energy deficits and complement industrialization. Further, expenditure on education infrastructure or construction of new schools and vocational training centres was also directed towards human capital formation. These developments highlighted the importance of foreign aid in boosting the overarching balance sheet of Pakistan’s economy and development agenda with reference to structural correction.
- ✓Enhanced political alliances and counterterrorism capabilities
To a large extent, foreign aid in the post-9/11 era proved very useful in expanding Pakistan’s political arch and improving its counter-terrorism efforts. The stepped-up international help, especially from the American and friendly nations, made it possible to build strategic partnerships coordinated with other international security interests. This is not only a measure to strengthen diplomatic relations with the United States and to help support Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies in practical counter-terrorism efforts. The insurgents opted for united operations, and intelligence sharing reduced their activities and enhanced regional conditions. Such improvements in the alliances and security confirm a strong needed message on foreign aid towards global terrorism while simultaneously supporting geopolitical solidarity and shared interests.
- ✓Better access to healthcare and education for communities
Moreover, in Pakistan’s post-9/11 era, foreign aid significantly improved access to healthcare and education and closed broader gaps in human development. International donors, such as USAID, were also providing millions of dollars of development aid to such policies as the construction of health infrastructure, polio eradication campaigns and maternal care programmes. For instance, $850 million in healthcare was directly given by USAID from 2002 to 2012 to improve vaccination rates and reduce child mortality in rural areas. Similarly, educational funding under schemes like the United Nations’ Education For All programme helped set up schools in underdeveloped areas while training thousands of teachers—the support of marginalized communities to mainstream development. Helping to rebuild hospitals and schools after the 2005 earthquake and providing post-disaster humanitarian aid, such as after the 2005 earthquake, was also huge for people in affected areas. However, efforts to help through foreign funds were often constrained by governance problems and uneven distribution, so the sustainability of foreign-funded social development can be doubtful. However, these contributions contributed positively to providing short-run relief and established grounds for future growth in the health and education sectors.
Negative Impacts of Foreign Aid in the Post-9/11 Era
- ✓Rising national debt and overreliance on external funding
Foreign aid to Pakistan surged in the post-9/11 era, which initially helped the country but eventually increased national debt and dependence on external funding, damaging long-term economic stability. Pakistan’s strategic alliance in the War on Terror, post 9/11, has netted the impoverished country more than $33 billion in aid from the USA. However, much of this aid, the loans with strict repayment terms, came in the form of further ballooning Pakistan’s external debt, which jumped from $30 billion in 2001 to over $90 billion by 2020. There, successive governments stifled domestic resource mobilization by depending on external assistance, intending to satisfy short-term fiscal relief rather than sustainable economic reform. To the extent that much of the aid was specified in terms of conditions attached to its use, Pakistan had little ability to channel the funding towards more pressing developmental priorities. This overreliance also degraded economic self‐reliance, where sectors like defence and counter-terrorism depended on foreign financing, not Indigenous capabilities. Foreign aid essentially made an immediate difference to Pakistan’s immediate fiscal situation. However, it made the economy vulnerable to external forces and other donor’s focuses, generating a cycle of aid that brought down Pakistan’s autonomous fund.
- ✓Loss of sovereignty due to donor conditions
Foreign aid, especially after 9/11, was mainly conditional and meant those deals tied Pakistan to several conditions, severely eroding its sovereignty. So, donor nations, including the United States, wanted to impose the conditions related to geopolitical and strategic goals on the recipients as part of assistance packages. For instance, Pakistan’s role in counterterrorism, especially military operations in the tribal areas and Intelligence sharing, has been affected more by external extra-regional dynamics than by its internal regional dynamics. The provision of financial aid was attached to specific reforms in civil governance and military management in Pakistan in the past Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act of 2009, which created backlash complaints that America was interfering in Pakistan’s affairs. In addition, pivotal international organisations, including the IMF and the World Bank, prescribed economic policies, including subsidies and taxes, that were tuned with local economic goals and led to protests among the public. The scope of eroding autonomy was not limited to policies as foreign-funded projects tended to follow the following more than Pakistan requires. The continuous loss of sovereignty gave rise to anti-western sentiments and political insecurity as the citizens and political leaders formed their opinions about the government’s ability to negotiate for the country’s benefit.
- ✓Increased social division and polarization over foreign alliances
The post-9/11 foreign aid has further deepened the social cleavages and polarization in Pakistan mainly due to cross-cutting issues of foreign policy that predominantly Muslim countries have with the Western world, particularly the United States of America. When foreign aid poured in, it brought with it discourses of counterterrorism in which Pakistan was depicted as an important partner in the War on Terror, thus eroding segments of society perceived such affiliations as a threat to Pakistan’s sovereignty and its Islamic cultural identity. In the Pew Research Centre analysis, disapproval of the USA’s participation in this international conflict has reduced, with ratings today falling below 20 % to signify disapproval. This dissatisfaction has led to radical political groups and anti-foreign energies in different parts of the world, hence the formation of militant groups taking advantage of perceived ‘interference’ from the far side. In addition, polarization is manifested socially, where parties seek to woo voters through anti-foreign campaigns to the extent that the public’s social interaction is soaked in conspiracy theories and scepticism regarding the government’s foreign policy. These separations have also been well-expressed in the present society through social media, which is mobilized with fake news and radical views. As such, the communal, integrated, multicultural, and diverse country is today more polarized, making consensus on urgent, crucial and significant issues harder to achieve, shifting the compound into a volatile one.
From Benefactor to Burden: A Critical Reflection on Foreign Aid Dynamics After 9/11
To critically analyse, the nature of foreign aid to Pakistan post 9/11 can, therefore, be described as a shift from a partner-like situation to a parasite situation. Foreign aid was supposed to prop up the flagging Pakistan economy and back the country’s counter-terrorism efforts, but what it has done is only create a culture of dependency that continues to weaken Pakistan’s sovereignty and further compromise its brittle economy. The increase in aid has also come with conditionalities that enhance the donor country’s selfish interests instead of the development of Pakistan. Hence, the economy has become more sensitive, with the emerging national debt of over $100 billion, which is provided to meet the world superpowers’ demands rather than providing an adequate and quality base for a functional domestic economy. Furthermore, dependence on outside help has weakened local processes, leaving the government with nearly no incentives to push for structural policy changes. Worst of all, the relationship has poisoned the outlook of the public and deepened their discontent, where they see their government as being biased in favour of foreign nations, hence encouraging terror and insecurity. Ultimately, the transition from benefactor to burden illustrates a broader critique of foreign aid: The critical view has been that such help without regard to encouraging people to become more self-sufficient or to offer what is necessary to stimulate local industries can help perpetuate a culture of reliance and erode sovereignty.
Conclusion
To conclude, in the period after September 11, 2001, foreign assistance played a massive role in shaping Pakistan’s economy, politics, and society. However, with the resources necessary for building infrastructure, countering terrorism, and other social welfare projects, has come a set of quite serious problems, some of which have emerged quite visibly over the last year. With it have often come demands for greater accountability. In the opinion of some (including many Pakistanis), it has sometimes provided too little and sometimes too much in the way of demands for “reforms”—demands that have sometimes, and often quite justifiably, been seen by various segments of Pakistani society as infringing on the country’s sovereignty and an unwelcome intrusion into Pakistan’s domestic political affairs.
CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays
Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.
CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers
Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students.
General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers
