CSS 2006 Solved Current Affairs Past Papers | UN Security Council as a Tool for Veto Wielding Powers
The following question of CSS Current Affairs 2006 is solved by Sir Ammar Hashmi, the best Current Affairs Coach, on the guided pattern of Sir Syed Kazim Ali, which he taught to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. This solved past paper question is uploaded to help aspirants understand how to crack a topic or question, write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.
Question breakdown:
This Question Has One Part, i.e., the Need for Reforms to Enhance the Effectiveness, Representativeness, and Legitimacy of the UNSC.
Outline
1-Introduction
2-Overview of the Current Structure and Functioning of the UNSC
3-Critiques of the Current Veto System
4-Proposed Veto Power Reforms and UNSC Restructuring
- ✓Expanding Permanent Membership with Restricted Veto Power
- ✓Conditional Use of Veto Power
- ✓Shared or Regional Veto Authority
- ✓Introduction of accountability mechanisms for veto usage
5-Expected Benefits of Restructuring the U.N. Security Council
- ✓Increased Legitimacy and Global Confidence
- ✓Enhanced Decision-Making and Reduced Gridlock
- ✓Strengthened Global Cooperation and Effective Collective Security
6-Challenges to Restructuring the U.N. Security Council and Considerations for Implementation
- ✓Resistance from Permanent Members
- ✓Balancing Conflicting Regional and National Interests
- ✓Potential for Increased Geopolitical Tensions
7-Critical Analysis
8-Conclusion
Introduction
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC), since its formation in 1945, is the principal organ charged with maintaining international peace and security. Nevertheless, with changing dynamics of global power, the structure and performance of the UNSC have increasingly come under fire, with its ossified architecture and disproportionate concentration of the veto power on the five permanent members, China, France, Russia, the U.K., and the U.S., attracting particular attention. It was intended as a temporary measure to ward off significant conflicts, but the permanent members regularly used it to ramrod their national interests even with relatively weak hands. It has also fuelled calls to reform to bring about a more democratic and representative system. Recurrent criticisms of the current veto system focus on inefficiency, biased decision-making, and deadlock on essential issues. For this reason, reform proposals, like the expansion of permanent membership with restricted veto power, conditional usage of veto power based on the criteria above, shared or regional veto, on the other hand, and accountability measures to assure conformity of vetoes to international law and ethical considerations. With these changes, the UNSC has the potential to restructure, with these changes promising benefits like enhanced global legitimacy, better decision making and better collective security. However, such reforms meet several challenges, including opposition from the interests already entrenched through existing veto positions, complex balancing among multifarious regional priorities, and the danger of new geopolitical spats. With these complexities, a balanced reform is necessary to ensure that the UNSC meets the current international reality and bolsters a balanced and fair international order.
Overview of the Current Structure and Functioning of the UNSC
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is comprised of fifteen members and has five permanent nations, including China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, with the power to veto. The other ten nations, chosen for two years, have no power to veto. The primary functions of the UNSC include overseeing global order with the capacity to sanction, authorize the application of force and pass resolutions that have the force of law. It disassociates the Council from representing independent opinion because the veto granted to the five permanent members of the Council means that any of them has the power to veto the Council’s actions. This causes the five permanent members of the Council to dominate the decision-making processes. Of the ten non-permanent members, their primary function is to speak and even vote, but they have no authority to veto or nullify outcomes. It looks like a minimalist structure designed right after the Second World War, and indeed, the world has changed very little since then, and such a global redistribution of power has not occurred. Therefore, the existing structure of the UNSC draws criticism as entirely non-representative, thereby frequently hampering expedient and objective reactions to crises on the world stage.
Critiques of the Current Veto System
The veto power inherent in the United Nations Security Council has become the subject of scorn due to perceived biases and flaws that surround it and prevent it from being an optimal solution for world disputes. The veto power, whereby only the five permanent members can prevent substantive resolution, may culminate in a deadlock whenever essential matters are under discussion. For example, the veto has been used in the cases of the conflict in Syria and Palestine, against which it has undermined the managerial role of the UNSC; it is a body that should handle cases as expected, and many perceive it as biased and inefficient. In addition, they assert that the veto system allows those countries to vote in their interest rather than based on the common good — peace and order worldwide. The veto power is absolutist. It goes against the democratic principles of the United Nations because the ten non-permanent members that form the body and the rest of the international society have no say in the matter. This has consequently caused frustrations in the member states that feel the UNSC does not bear the modern international relations because of the emergence of new economic and political players without permanent seats or veto powers. Finally, many people regard the veto system as wholly inappropriate to the 21st century and hampering the Council’s effectiveness in dealing with severe global threats and challenges.
Proposed Veto Power Reforms and UNSC Restructuring
- ✓ Expanding Permanent Membership with Restricted Veto Power
The most frequently recommended reform is increasing the number of permanent members of the UNSC by including mighty global powers such as Germany, Japan, India, and Brazil. ‘No reform of the U.N. would be complete without reform of the Security Council,’ said former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, referring to the talk of reform in these nations, which also feature prominently in the Security Council, for a voice that is proportional to their role and economic prowess. Members with restricted or phased veto rights of the Council could be added, making the Council more credible and equitable.
- ✓ Conditional Use of Veto Power
Former U.S. ambassador and U.N. representative Madeleine Albright is one of many experts who have supported the requirement for a dual or collective agreement before a veto can be used based on permanent members. This proposal would discourage unilateral ‘veto’, which routinely inhibits international action. According to Albright, responsible multilateralism is needed for its effectiveness, and it would be fairer and more global-minded if single-member vetoes were limited.
- ✓ Shared or Regional Veto Authority
Many developing nations and distinguished international relations observers support a shared or regional veto system capable of limiting the oligopolistic power widely seen as an anachronism. African Union representatives have for years called for such a system, and former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, who was among those representing the African Union in the DRC, argued that Africa could no longer continue to be denied a permanent voice in vital issues that affect people of the continent. Using a regional veto approach will slash the power gap between continents while allowing underrepresented regions to contribute to decisions that affect their region directly.
- ✓ Introduction of accountability mechanisms for veto usage
Several human rights organizations and U.N. officials have proposed introducing formal accountability mechanisms around using the veto. ‘Permanent members should be held accountable for vetoes which block humanitarian interventions, especially in situations like Syria and Darfur,’ argued Kenneth Roth, former Human Rights Watch executive director. If the UNSC were entitled to explanations before exercising a veto, that would deter misuse and better align what the UNSC does with humanitarian principles.
Expected Benefits of Restructuring the U.N. Security Council
- ✓ Increased Legitimacy and Global Confidence
A UNSC with a reformed composition regarding the disbursement of veto power will likely bring greater legitimacy and trust to the organization globally. “A more inclusive Security Council that reflects the realities of today’s 21st century will command greater respect and trust of the global community,” said former U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. Expanding permanent membership to include some new powers would ensure that a more significant number of countries are interested in what the Council does and would give the impression of greater fairness and a more extraordinary claim to authority and, therefore, to the validity of Council decisions.
- ✓ Enhanced Decision-Making and Reduced Gridlock
Reducing the instances of unilateral vetoes by restricting the veto system to require collective agreement or less would allow critical issues to move forward. Repeated vetoes by individual permanent members in Syria and Palestine have stalled conflict action, dashing the Council’s potential to respond to crises quickly. The reform would help the UNSC work together better when quick, coordinated action is necessary.
- ✓ Strengthened Global Cooperation and Effective Collective Security
It could create conditions for greater international cooperation that follow more naturally from the U.N.’s principle of collective security on which it was founded. Bringing new permanent members and ensuring a more significant regional presence would help the Council respond to security worries across various regions, from Africa to South America. This inclusiveness will make member states work together more openly and have a sense of responsibility to share. In an ideal world, a more inclusive and balanced Council would provide the foundation for global peace and stability through universally concerted actions, as international relations scholars are careful to remember.
Challenges to Restructuring the U.N. Security Council and Considerations for Implementation
- ✓ Resistance from Permanent Members
The current permanent members are resistant to UNSC reform because the reality is that each enjoys considerable power and needs more reason to dilute it by easing up. China and Russia, in particular, have mostly opposed reforms that would compromise their best position within the Council. Any substantial change in the veto system would meet with resistance from those who profit most, ‘any substantial change in the veto system is bound to be met with resistance from those who benefit most,’ says former U.S. ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, noting the entrenched P5 interests that would call a veto on any proposal that would upend the balance of power.
- ✓ Balancing Conflicting Regional and National Interests
Another challenge is restructuring the UNSC so that it represents various regions and emerging powers, given that member states have competing priorities. For instance, while India and Pakistan are nuclear-armed regional states seeking different roles within a restructured Council, how Asia’s representation should be expanded complicates this question. African countries have lobbied together for increased representation but differ regarding which country should maintain a potential permanent seat. The proper balance of these conflicting interests, about fair regional representation, calls for diplomacy and patience and is best achieved in such a way as to de-escalate current rivalries, not escalate them.
- ✓ Potential for Increased Geopolitical Tensions
Lastly, new geopolitical tensions will also be there due to the restructuring of the UNSC as emerging powers with veto rights will pursue their national agendas. There is the danger that expanded veto power may only bring more deadlock, not less, as added permanent members would regard their interests as more important than collective action, experts warn. “In an expanded veto system, new countries are likely to replicate existing problems — more countries participate in deadlocks, and there are fewer resolutions on urgent issues,” suggested political analyst Richard Gowan. This risk highlights the importance of thoughtfully concocting reforms that encourage collaboration, not their carbon copy or even magnification of the inefficiencies of today’s world.
Critical Analysis
To critical analysis, restructuring the United Nations Security Council is indispensable to match the organization’s institutional makeup to today’s and tomorrow’s world. However, such reform is fraught with significant difficulties and risks. On the one hand, enlarging permanent membership and amending veto rights would redress the time-honoured complaint that the Council is unrepresentative and has excessive veto powers in the interest of the P5. Reducing such unilateral vetoes will reduce the instances in which critical action gets stalled on the critical issue, enhance the legitimacy of the UNSC, and enable the UNSC to respond more effectively to emergencies worldwide. However, giving more veto power to more states or even adding new ‘permanent’ members carries the risk that these new members will advance selfish national interests over collective security, and that would be another form of the same problem that the reforms are intended to solve. In addition, the current permanent members – especially those with substantial strategic leverage like the USA, Russia, and China — would be more hesitant to favour reforms that reduce their power as they would hardly reach an agreement. Adding another layer of complexity is that balancing regional interests, national priorities, and geopolitical rivalries complicates efforts to create a fair and equitable system. At the same time, competing claims to represent regions such as Asia, Africa, or Latin America would have made it more complicated. Ultimately, the possibility of a more inclusive and efficient global security framework through UNSC restructuring opens the path for this. However, meaningful reform is a hostage to the many political, diplomatic, and operational challenges, and treading cautiously in absorbing them is required.
Conclusion
In conclusion, reconstituting the United Nations Security Council in any form is a challenging but essential exercise that will make it better representative, more legitimate, and far more capable of responding to the problems of our time. The UNSC could represent the current spectrum and balance on the global map by increasing permanent membership, changing the veto power, and bringing accountability. However, such reforms, which existing permanent members would fiercely resist, will also need help to preserve regional interests. Innovative and unprecedented compromise by the international community is required, moving beyond sterile consensus in exchange for engagement in sustained dialogue that leads to pragmatic and incremental change, keeping a proper balance between preserving the realities of power and the ideals of global cooperation. The promise of having a reformed UNSC is that it will encourage a more uniform approach towards collective security and give the world a better balanced, effective and credible institution.
CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays
Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.
CSS Solved Essays
CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers
Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students.
General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers
