Search

Discuss the Possibilities of Progress Under the Recently Agreed Rubric of Comprehensive Dialogue Between Pakistan and India. In your opinion, what are the Major Constraints at Present?

CSS 2016 Current Affairs Past Papers Question, "Possibilities of Dialogue b/w Pakistan and India" is solved by Sir Ammar Hashmi...

CSS 2016 Solved Current Affairs Past Papers | Possibilities of Dialogue b/w Pakistan and India

The following question of CSS Current Affairs 2016 is solved by Sir Ammar Hashmi, the best Current Affairs Coach, on the guided pattern of Sir Syed Kazim Ali, which he taught to his students, scoring the highest marks in compulsory subjects for years. This solved past paper question is uploaded to help aspirants understand how to crack a topic or question, how to write relevantly, what coherence is, and how to include and connect ideas, opinions, and suggestions to score the maximum.

Howfiv Official WhatsApp Channel

Question Breakdown

This question has two parts.

  1. The Possibilities of Progress Under the Recently Agreed Rubric of Comprehensive Dialogue Between Pakistan and India.             
  2. In our Opinion, What are the Major Constraints at Present?

Outline

1-Introduction

2-Overview of the Recently Agreed Rubric of Comprehensive Dialogue

3-Possibilities of Progress under the Recently Agreed Rubric of Comprehensive Dialogue between Pakistan and India

  • ✓ Enhancing Trade and Economic Cooperation
  • ✓ Strengthening Counterterrorism Measures
  • ✓ Resolving Water Disputes through Dialogue
  • ✓ Encouraging People-to-People Connections
  • ✓ Establishing Long-Term Regional Security Cooperation

4-Major Constraints at Present in the way of Dailogue between Pakistan and India

  • ✓Impact of Cross-Border Terrorism on Diplomatic Efforts
  • ✓ Unresolved Kashmir Conflict Hindering Progress
  • ✓ Domestic Political Pressures in Both Countries
  • ✓ Lack of Trust due to Historical Mistrust
  • ✓ Influence of External Powers on Regional Dynamics
  • ✓ Policy Shifts and Changes in Leadership

5-Critical Analysis

6-Conclusion

Extensive English Essay and Precis Course for CSS & PMS Aspirants

Answer to the Question

Introduction

The comprehensive dialogue between Pakistan and India, agreed upon in 2015-2016, opened up possibilities for some meaningful progress in history-strained relations between the two countries. By their admission, this dialogue focused on areas of common interest, which included trade expansion efforts, efforts to combat terrorism, resolving water disputes, and promoting people-to-people interactions. There was potential for progress in strengthening economic relations, increasing cooperation on efforts towards security and resolving long-standing conflicts diplomatically. However, this progress was thwarted by high impediments like cross-border terrorism, the unresolved issues of Kashmir, political pressures and deep-rooted trust deficit. Nonetheless, the adroit use of the dialogue framework served as a key avenue to bring the two nations closer to a more secure and cooperative relationship if they were willing to steer through the thickets of that tension with a sustained effort of dialogue.

Overview of the Recently Agreed Rubric of Comprehensive Dialogue

To begin with, in 2015-2016, Pakistan and India agreed to resume comprehensive dialogue, essentially a structured endeavour to tackle the major bilateral issues of the two countries. It covered a range of critical areas, including the long-standing Kashmir dispute and counter-terror efforts, trade normalization, water-sharing agreements under the Indus Water Treaty and easing border tension. The dialogue was supposed to help the two sides cooperate on issues like these and use them to help resolve problems peacefully. If successfully carried out, this comprehensive dialogue had the capacity to very effectively open the door to increase stability and mutual trust between the two countries.

Possibilities of Progress under the Recently Agreed Rubric of Comprehensive Dialogue between Pakistan and India

  • Enhancing Trade and Economic Cooperation

An opportunity exists at this time for Pakistan and India to jointly strengthen their economic ties through a comprehensive dialogue framework. Such countries can address trade normalization between them by granting the Most Favored Nation (MFN) status, which can remove trade barriers. An increase in market access, investment flows, and economic interdependence would benefit both nations and, according to this reform, would be enabled. Mutual reliance in the economic sphere can generate greater economic cooperation, and maintaining peace becomes an economic necessity for the long-term stability of the region.

  • Strengthening Counterterrorism Measures

Moreover, the comprehensive dialogue between Pakistan and India, on the one hand and India, on the other hand, focuses on counterterrorism efforts as a critical area. Both countries have been victims of terror and put an opportunity forward to work with each other to curb cross-border terrorism and intelligence sharing. Pakistan and India can diminish the trust deficit that tends to exacerbate tensions if the two coordinate in finding security solutions. Mutual national security interests are highly served counterterrorism cooperation and will contribute to regional peace and stability, creating an excellent emanating environment for future diplomatic engagement.

  • Resolving Water Disputes through Dialogue

Another area of potential progress that builds on the positive momentum of the comprehensive dialogue is resolving water disputes. On the Indus River, the Indus Water Treaty governs the waters between both nations; the waters are the dependency of both nations. However, water-sharing arrangements have been complicated by rising tensions. Dialogue framework creates a structured platform for handling these disputes proactively and contributes to cooperative resource management of water resources. This cooperation strengthens not only de-escalating the tensions but also a critical resource issue, which is that both countries have to benefit from sustainable water.

  • Encouraging People-to-People Connections

Similarly, improving diplomatic ties between Pakistan and India is critical in fostering people-to-people links between the two countries. This all-encompassing dialogue covers easing visa restrictions and promoting cultural exchanges and tourism. Intervening in these interpersonal ties strengthens these relationships and can help to create trust and avoid hostilities at the local level. Soft diplomacy allows for more interaction between citizens of both countries and, as such, makes it more difficult for political tensions to become steeped in violence. If we make that effort to humanize one another’s struggles and successes, then we can grow closer to one another.

  • Establishing Long-Term Regional Security Cooperation

Moving further, within the comprehensive dialogue, regional security cooperation remains a key area of focus based on continued building on the broad theme of trust and collaboration. Shared security challenges, such as border management and regional instability, give Pakistan and India an opportunity to work together and create a stable environment in which they could work together afterwards. Long-term peace depends on joint initiatives on border control, military de-escalation, and the prevention of skirmishes on the cross border. The creation of such cooperation is meant to foster a sense of mutual security that creates less chance of unintended conflicts and alignment on regional peace efforts.

Major Constraints at Present in the way of Dailogue between Pakistan and India

  • Impact of Cross-Border Terrorism on Diplomatic Efforts

The comprehensive dialogue provides many routes toward progress but faces significant constraints that block lasting results. Cross-border terrorism between Pakistan and India continues to disrupt relations, one of the biggest obstacles to sustained dialogue. Both attacks derail diplomatic efforts, like the Pathankot attack 2016, but the trust deficit snowballs. Pakistan denies allegations that it harbours the militant groups, and India is accused of harbouring the militant groups. The framework exists, but these standard tensions make an honest dialogue between both nations difficult.

  • Unresolved Kashmir Conflict Hindering Progress

Besides, the Kashmir conflict, in totality, is a key obstacle to the progress of overall dialogue. The central bone of contention between Pakistan and India, and the source of bitter feeling, is over the status of Kashmir, which has not been resolved. Pakistan says Kashmir should have the right of self-determination, while India insists the region is part of India. Add to that the ongoing unrest in Kashmir, with both sides accusing the other of making the mess worse. At this point, a solution to this dispute is still a long way from contributing to long-term peace and cooperation.

  • Domestic Political Pressures in Both Countries

In addition, domestic political pressures on Pakistan and India’s governments constrain progress under the comprehensive dialogue. Engagements with Pakistan, therefore, are fraught with risk because politics in India is predominantly security-driven and political factions see the same engagements with Pakistan from that prism. Also, like Pakistan, it is partying its internal challenges — political instability, the play of conflicting interests — not allowing it to invest in the full amount of sustained dialogue it could. It impedes countries from engaging in concrete steps to promote reconciliation.

  • Lack of Trust due to Historical Mistrust

Another major constraint is the deep historical mistrust between Pakistan and India in the comprehensive dialogue. The hostility that has lasted for decades of past wars and failed peace attempts has built up a legacy of suspicion. The persistent doubts by both nations that the other is working mischief in one way or the other begin to weaken even the most sophisticated diplomatic schemes. However, this trust gap complicates negotiations because both countries view each other’s actions as threats rather than opportunities for peace. It is, therefore, impossible for the two states to ensure trust without sustained and consistent efforts over time.

  • Influence of External Powers on Regional Dynamics

Besides, it only increases the entanglement of advancing the all-sided conversation between Pakistan and India and the global powers of America, China, and Russia. Every nation has its self-serving agenda regarding the state of affairs in South Asia and how that may be managed. For instance, Pakistan may align itself depending on competition between the US and China. Another layer originates from outside the bilateral dynamic, which often superimposes strategic partnership or rivalry management over dialogue as a means to realign priorities.

  • Policy Shifts and Changes in Leadership

Also, the continuation of the broad discursive process in the two countries is closely related to the shifts in leadership and policies in Pakistan and India. Sometimes, it is, and new administrations bring new objectives on the diplomatic playing field started by predecessors. New leadership can entail tightening up or failing to follow up on prior discussions as an organisation. It causes fluctuations in diplomacy, which would mean that lifespan is obtained at a tempo that is too slow for achieving sustainable objectives. Thus, once again, when the frameworks for discussion are instituted, political changes more often provide the framework for their destruction.

Critical Analysis

To critically analyse, although this implies there is extensive dialogue organised by Pakistan and India that clearly outlines the structure of the complicated problem and its resolution, there are several factors which, if incorporated, could have enhanced the effectiveness of the list above. The dialogue format allows the two actors to build synergism in trade, counterterrorism, and regional security. It is noteworthy, however, that several sources sign that this potential remains somewhat unfulfilled owing to mistrust, changing political circumstances permanently, and new threats, such as international terrorism. The military struggle for control of the Kashmir territory is that which is still a wet blanket on any potential progression. The internal political situation also prevents the freedom required in negotiations, and local politicians are pressured from the left and the right. They will not allow concessions in the interest of the mutual welfare of their nations. In other words, how much external factors contribute to the enmity affects the regional interactions between the two countries and pulls them into gigantic power political games which mask the bilateral relations. Similarly, leadership and policies on the international level bring the problem to the fore, which would stall the peace process because of government changes in the involved nations. The same construct is evidenced at this level. Of course, it is equally valid that the optimistic framework for dialogue is not beyond the interactions’ regional and domestic forces with which the relation has been imbued. This has, without doubt, reinforced the possibilities of diplomatic interaction. Long story short, both states are assured long-term peace in the region if they can keep their egos aside and start to think about those who put them in place as the European countries did after the 2nd World War.

Conclusion

To conclude, the intense dialogue between the two contending nuclear neighbours has the potential to correct wrongs and put them through structured cooperation. Political relations are developing in many fields, including trade relations, counterterrorism, hydropower, and security. However, a clear way ahead is conditional on substantial challenges of cross-border terrorism and the unresolved Kashmir issue, domestic political compulsions, the classical trust deficit, external interferences, and volatile diplomatic oscillations. Therefore, continuous diplomatic diplomacy and diplomatic efforts, besides efforts to solve these challenges, will pave the way for long-term intra-state cooperation and, hence, a solution to the recurring conflict.

CSS Solved Past Papers’ Essays

Looking for the last ten years of CSS and PMS Solved Essays and want to know how Sir Kazim’s students write and score the highest marks in the essays’ papers? Then, click on the CSS Solved Essays to start reading them.

CSS Solved Essays

CSS Solved General Science & Ability Past Papers

Want to read the last ten years’ General Science & Ability Solved Past Papers to learn how to attempt them and to score high? Let’s click on the link below to read them all freely. All past papers have been solved by Pakistan’s top CSS GSA coach having the highest score of their students.

General Science & Ability Solved Past Pape

Share Via
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Recent Posts

Cssprepforum

Education Company

Cssprepforum

cssprepforum.com

Welcome to Cssprepforum, Pakistan’s largest learning management system (LMS) with millions of questions along with their logical explanations educating millions of learners, students, aspirants, teachers, professors, and parents preparing for a successful future. 

Founder: Syed Kazim Ali
Founded: 2020
Phone: +92-332-6105-842
+92-300-6322-446
Email: howfiv@gmail.com
Students Served: 10 Million
Daily Learners: 50,000
Offered Courses: Visit Courses  

More Courses

RS 7000
Cssprepforum
All
3 Weeks
CPF

CPF

5/5
RS 15000
Extensive English Essay & Precis Course for CSS
Intermediate
4 Weeks
CPF

CPF

5/5
RS 15000
DSC_1766-1-scaled_11zon
Intermediate
2 Weeks
CPF

CPF

5/5
error: Content is protected !!